GSAN: Black press legacy | LawTubers

Get Smart About News

Your guide to helping young
people get smart about news.

 

In this issue

Black press legacy | LawTubers

 
 

Top picks

Reader, this section highlights the latest news literacy topics and ways for you to engage with the kids in your life.

A sepia-toned portrait of investigative journalist Ida B. Wells.
Ida B. Wells, photographed circa 1893, was born into slavery and became a legendary investigative journalist. Photo credit: Sallie E. Garrity.

1. Celebrating legacy of the Black press

The Black press has long played an essential role in the United States. From Ida B. Wells’ investigative reporting more than a century ago on lynchings to modern-day publications’ efforts to spotlight the stories of Black Americans, Black-run newspapers have a legacy of countering biased coverage and acting as catalysts for change. Look no further than The Savannah Tribune, a Black-led weekly newspaper in Savannah, Georgia, that will celebrate its 150th anniversary this summer. The paper launched in 1875, a decade after the U.S. Civil War ended, and faced many challenges throughout its history — printing operators refusing to print the paper, the Jim Crow era, legal obstacles and a destructive fire. Nevertheless, the paper has provided reliable news coverage for Black residents, building trust and affection in the community for fearless reporting over the years of racial and policy issues.

Engage:

Share with the teenagers in your life this History.com article on three historic Black news publications — Freedom’s Journal, The North Star and Provincial Freeman — and discuss the role of the Black press in the 19th century. How did 19th-century Black newspapers contribute to the abolitionist movement? Why is the Black press significant, both historically and today?

2. Newspaper ordered by judge to remove editorial

A judge in Mississippi recently ordered a local newspaper to delete an editorial criticizing government officials from its website in a decision that press advocates say violates the First Amendment. The Clarksdale Press Register editorial criticized the mayor of Clarksdale, Mississippi, and city commissioners for not notifying news media of a special meeting where they voted on a resolution for a tax on alcohol, marijuana and tobacco. It also questioned city officials’ interest behind the resolution. City officials then sued the paper for libel, requesting the courts order the newspaper to remove the editorial. A county judge agreed, gave the order, and the newspaper complied — but the paper’s owner told The New York Times they plan to challenge the order.

“This is bigger than one newspaper or one ruling. If a judge can make journalism disappear with the stroke of a pen, what’s next? A free press is not a privilege; it’s a right,” National Press Club President Mike Balsamo said in a statement.

Engage:

Share this story with the teens in your life and discuss the role of the First Amendment. Does the judge’s order violate First Amendment rights? Why or why not? Should the newspaper have been allowed to keep the editorial on its website? Why or why not? Why are press advocates alarmed by this lawsuit against the Mississippi newspaper?

★ Tools for the talk:

3. Why do people seek news?

Age impacts news habits more than the country a person lives in, according to a new study based on a survey of 45,000 Europeans in 23 countries. Younger survey respondents — ages 18 to 35 — were more likely to seek news for personal growth and for entertainment and social reasons. The older cohort — age 35 and older — were more motivated to gain knowledge and better understand current events. Both age groups were equally likely to cite civic duty as a reason for paying attention to news.

Engage:

Talk to the kids in your life about why they turn to the news (if they do). What are their reasons for viewing the news? Share your reasons too and see if they’re similar or different. If you know teens, share this report with them and ask them what they think. Do they agree or disagree with the findings of this study?

★ Tool for the talk:

 
RumorGuard Rundown

No, 20 million dead people are not receiving Social Security checks

A social media post reads, “Almost 20 million dead people are receiving social security checks. WTF 🤬” and features a chart supposedly showing millions of people over the age of 100 registered for Social Security. The News Literacy Project has added a label that says “MISINTERPRETATION.”

NO: The Social Security Administration (SSA) is not sending checks to 20 million dead people.

YES: SSA acting commissioner Lee Dudek explained that this claim refers to people who were once eligible for Social Security and who died, but who did not have information about their death recorded.

YES: The SSA has previously acknowledged an issue with improper payments and has implemented various fixes, such as a 2015 policy that stops automatic payments to people over the age of 115.

★ NewsLit takeaway

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Social media posts that make sensational claims – such as widespread Social Security fraud – need to be carefully examined. Is there evidence? What’s the source? Is there additional context? Here are a few suggestions to help slow your scroll on social media to better spot these spurious posts.

Look for logical explanations: Charts, graphs, photos and videos are often taken out of context and shared with inaccurate claims. Remember, the simplest explanation is often the correct one.

Wait for additional reporting: Sensational claims are designed to grab people’s attention, but they often don’t contain the full context. By refraining from immediate judgment, we can give credible news outlets time to properly investigate a claim.

Check for additional context: Social media posts contain short bits of information (often inaccurate) that rarely portray the complete story. To stay informed, we need to read beyond these individual posts and search for standards-based news articles.

Editor's Note: The example image for this entry has been modified to reduce its length. The relevant portions of the post are still visible.

 

No, Elizabeth Warren didn’t say government spending should be secret

An Instagram post features a photograph of Sen. Elizabeth Warren and the text “There is nothing in the constitution that says ordinary Americans have a right to see what we’re spending tax dollars on. Senator Warren, January 30, 2025.” The News Literacy Project has added a label that says “FAKE QUOTE.”

NO: U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., did not say, “There is nothing in the Constitution that says ordinary Americans have a right to see what we’re spending tax dollars on.”

YES: This is a fabricated quote falsely attributed to Warren.

YES: The Constitution mandates that the public have access to information about government spending.

★ NewsLit takeaway

Disinformation is frequently created to support political talking points. In February 2025, several inaccurate or entirely false claims related to government spending spread on social media as presidential adviser Elon Musk gained access to the federal payments system. Warren is a consumer advocate and leading critic of Musk’s actions, and the above quote suggesting that she was trying to limit the public’s access to budgetary information also began to circulate. The remark may have “felt” true to some, but a bit of research shows it is a fake quote. Here are a few things that fact-checkers did (and some steps you can take next time) to debunk this falsehood.

  1. View official social media profiles: Tracing a quote back to its source is a good way to verify or debunk online claims. In this case, a search of Warren’s social media accounts yielded no matches.
  2. Examine public statements and appearances: Warren issued two public statements on Jan. 30, but none of them included this phrase.
  3. Check news reports: If this statement were genuine, it would likely appear in a news report. Yet, that search also came up empty-handed.
  4. Seek comment: Journalists contacted Warren’s office about the remark, and a spokesperson confirmed that this quote was fake.
Kickers (Journalism slang). Definition: The ending of a story or news report, often intended to leave a lasting impression.
bullet From science to current events and sports, teachers say students regularly ask about claims they’re seeing on social media. Educators interviewed by Teen Vogue say discerning fact from fiction is an urgent need — and pointed to media literacy as one solution. (Note: NLP is mentioned in this article.)
bullet Do podcast hosts and politicians count as news influencers? Some people think so. Pew Research Center asked Americans to name a news influencer, and the wide range of answers showed no consensus on how the term is defined.
bullet Over on “LawTube,” lawyers and other experts with YouTube channels and podcasts are providing in-depth analysis of courtroom drama and high-profile cases — much to the delight of true crime “CrimeTube” fans. Some videos run as long as seven hours and provide gavel-to-gavel coverage to highly engaged audiences.
bullet A growing group of online creators are pushing back on wellness influencers who spread false information and unproven remedies. Mallory DeMille, for instance, does handstands in some of her videos to highlight the “mental gymnastics” and convoluted thinking in wellness talking points.
bullet While platforms like X and Facebook have removed fact-checking programs and replaced them with crowdsourced community notes, a new study found that professional fact-checkers remain among the most cited sources in the notes feature on X.
bullet In Nebraska, online rumors about immigration detentions are creating fear among Latinos and fueling misinformation that advocates and law enforcement say misrepresent a more nuanced reality.
bullet Is AI making people dumb? New research found that when people rely on generative AI technology, it can impair critical thinking skills.
bullet E-book provider Hoopla has begun removing AI-generated e-books after a 404 Media report found that low-quality AI content was becoming more widespread on e-book platforms used by public libraries. (Read more about these AI e-books in the last GSAN issue.)
FEEDBACK

How do you like this newsletter?

Dislike? Not sure? Like? Click to fill out our feedback survey.

Thanks for reading!

Your weekly issue of Get Smart About News is created by Susan Minichiello (@susanmini.bsky.social), Dan Evon (@danieljevon), Peter Adams (@peteradams.bsky.social), Hannah Covington (@hannahcov.bsky.social) and Pamela Brunskill (@PamelaBrunskill). It is edited by Mary Kane (@mk6325.bsky.social) and Lourdes Venard (@lourdesvenard.bsky.social).

For more tips on talking with kids about news literacy, take a look back at previous Get Smart About News issues in the archives.

STAY IN THE KNOW

Subscribe to this newsletter

Sign up to receive NLP Connections (news about our work) or switch your subscription to the educator version of Get Smart About News called The Sift® here.