|
Top picks
|
| The use of generative AI tools in journalism requires transparency, media experts say. Illustration credit: Moor Studio/Shutterstock.com. |
 |
Sports Illustrated appeared to use artificial intelligence technology to generate articles with fake bylines that even included AI-generated headshots and bios of nonexistent writers, Futurism reported. The author portraits were removed after Futurism reached out for comment and the sports magazine’s publisher, The Arena Group, later denied publishing AI-generated articles on the site and blamed a contractor.
The iconic sports magazine began publishing nearly 70 years ago. Sports Illustrated editorial staff, through a union statement, demanded that its parent company “commit to adhering to basic journalistic standards, including not publishing computer-written stories by fake people.”
 |
Idea: Use these classroom-ready slides with students to determine whether three examples of news articles are AI-generated or written by human journalists. |
- Discuss: How can you tell if AI technology is used to produce a news story? What are some pros and cons of news organizations using AI? What do you think of the way Sports Illustrated used AI-generated stories? How could AI be used by newsrooms in an ethical and transparent way that aligns with the standards of quality journalism?
- Resources:
- Related:
|
 |
When people see an AI-generated visual of a baby crying in a war zone, the emotional impact is the same as when they see a photo or video of a real baby, according to disinformation experts. Synthetic, AI-generated imagery of abandoned, injured and deceased babies — sometimes accompanied by images of families searching through rubble — has become a common type of online propaganda about the Israel-Hamas war. The fabricated images are engineered to provoke outrage, and experts say that synthetic imagery will be a challenge as well in upcoming elections, not just for spreading disinformation but also for sowing confusion between authentic photos and videos and fake ones.
- Discuss: How can you identify the primary purpose of information you see online? How challenging can it be to determine whether an image or video is AI-generated or authentic? How could AI-generated visuals affect elections? What would happen if the existence of AI-image technologies made people doubt the authenticity of everything they see?
- Resources:
- Related:
|
 |
There used to be thousands of full-time editorial cartoonists working at newspapers in the U.S., but The Association for American Editorial Cartoonists estimates there are now fewer than 30. However, nonprofit newsrooms like Mississippi Today and San Diego-based inewsource are flying in the face of that trend: both have hired full-time cartoonists in hopes of connecting more with readers on social media and at community events. The nonprofit publications cover serious, in-depth news stories, and editorial cartoons help bring visual clarity and “cut through a lot of the tensions,” said Mississippi Today CEO Mary Margaret White.
- Discuss: What value do editorial cartoons bring to news publications? Why are editorial cartoons usually in the opinion section of a newspaper? Why do editorial cartoons often elicit strong responses and criticism? What effect do editorial cartoons have on civic discourse and engagement? Can editorial cartoons play a watchdog role and help hold people in power accountable? How have editorial cartoons held people in power accountable?
- Idea: In small groups, have students browse collections of recent editorial cartoons (U.S. News, Politico, or Editorial & Political Cartoons), pick their favorites and then share with the class why.
- Resources:
- Related:
|
|