Teach news literacy this week Teens impact online safety | AI political ads
Welcome back, friend of news literacy,
You’re back at school, so we’re back in your inbox to be your guide to the week in news literacy, highlighting relevant and timely topics and the latest viral rumors — with ideas and tips for classroom integration. Each edition also includes a Dig Deeper classroom-ready resource to help your students explore a key topic from the week’s headlines.
Have any feedback or ideas you’d like to share? Please feel free to respond directly to this email or share your thoughts here. We need your insights to ensure that this newsletter is as engaging and useful as possible for your teaching.
Many young activists involved in kids’ online safety debates have asked for policies and reform. Photo credit: News Literacy Project.
Young people would like a say in online safety measures adults create for them, with some student-led activist groups successfully lobbying federal and state lawmakers. Whether it’s a question of scaling back parental consent for teens to access social media platforms or discussions about adding guardrails to algorithms that target minors, young activists say they’d like to be “meaningful collaborators” in online safety debates.
Discuss: What is the best thing, and the worst thing, about social media? Should the government pass regulations to protect teens online? Should young people be included in deciding which, if any, regulations are passed? Why or why not?
Dig deeper: Use this think sheet to explore how young people can impact online safety legislation. (Meets NLP Standard 5.)
A student-run newspaper in Chicago — which began five years ago as a pet project for a 10-year-old girl — has evolved into a hard-hitting publication that’s sparked interest in local news online and in print. The young staff of The Kidler have covered a wide array of local issues, including politics, disparities in public schools, housing, bike lanes and climate change. The 15-year-old publisher’s goal? “To encourage more participation in the democratic process.”
Idea: Divide students into small groups and ask them to review the latest issue of The Kidler. What kind of stories does the paper publish? How does staying informed on local news encourage people to be civically involved? Ask students to brainstorm ideas for stories they would like to see covered in their communities, then help them pitch some ideas to a local news organization.
Political ads with content generated or altered by artificial intelligence are allowed on YouTube and other Google products, but the tech company will soon require prominent disclaimers for those kinds of ads. There is pending federal legislation that would require such labels; in addition, the Federal Election Commission is exploring regulations on “deepfake” videos in political ads.
Discuss: Is it ethical to use AI-generated images and video in political ads? Should it be legal? What are the possible impacts of such ads? Will people be able to tell the difference between images and video that are AI-generated and those that are authentic? Should AI-generated political ads be regulated in some way by tech companies or the government? Why or why not?
NO: This is not an authentic video of a crowd chanting “We want Trump” as Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis addressed a prayer vigil for victims of an Aug. 26 shooting in Jacksonville, Florida. YES: The original video shows DeSantis being booed and heckled during the Aug. 27 vigil. But the audio of “We want Trump” chants and the CNN chyron — including the text “DESANTIS HECKLED IN JACKSONVILLE” — were digitally added to the clip.
NewsLit takeaway: Altering video by adding unrelated audio of crowds booing, cheering or chanting has become a common practice of purveyors of disinformation. This can be an effective tactic as it creates the appearance of public consensus. And due to the bandwagon effect, which is the tendency for people to follow the crowd, these manipulated videos can manipulate public opinion.
Since these altered videos typically feature noise from an offscreen source, there aren’t always visual cues to help determine the footage’s authenticity. Remember, checking viral content against multiple sources is the best way to make sure you don’t get duped by disinformation. Searching for “Ron DeSantis” and “heckled” pulled up several news articles about this footage, all of which reported that the crowd was booing and interrupting DeSantis — but not cheering for former President Donald Trump.
NO: The World Health Organization did not call for mass vaccinations to help combat climate change. YES: This rumor originated on The People’s Voice, a website with a long history of publishing falsehoods. YES: In an Aug. 9 media briefing, WHO officials discussed the role of climate change in the spread of illnesses in places where those infections don’t usually occur and the use of vaccines to address that specific problem. NO: None of the WHO officials at the media briefing or elsewhere have suggested mass vaccine mandates.
NewsLit takeaway: Making sure a news item came from a credible source is a key step in avoiding being misinformed. For an unfamiliar website, do a quick web search to see whether reputable news outlets published anything about it. In this case, a quick search shows that “The People’s Voice” is merely a rebrand of NewsPunch, a notorious purveyor of conspiracy theories and other fabricated content.
How do editors and reporters decide exactly how a headline should read? NPR’s public editor provides some answers to this question in an examination of this headline: “Top American cyclist Magnus White, 17, dies after being hit by a car.” One critical reader argued that the cyclist was hit by a driver, not a car — but editors had their reasons for this approach.
Black newspapers have historically provided essential coverage of Black people and social justice issues too often missing in the mainstream press — and in the digital age, that history isn’t lost on the new Black press.
AI technology played a major role in the firing of Gizmodo en Español staff. The Spanish-language news site will be replaced with AI translations of English articles — which lack the cultural knowledge and subtleties understood by human translators.
Before a struggling small newspaper in Iowa was about to shut down, community members quickly stepped in to keep the outlet going, with a focus on local school news and events.
K-12 students today were born after Sept. 11, 2001, so educators are teaching about the attacks in a more historical context — and addressing student questions inspired by conspiracy theories online.
Repeated exposure to sensational misinformation online can not only cause falsehoods to seem true, but it can also reduce how unethical sharing misinformation feels to people, according to a new study.
Drawing inspiration from the newly released New York Times game Connections, Nieman Lab created a journalism-themed quiz version of the game. (Want to show off a little? Share your results with us by replying to this email!🙂)
Love The Sift? Please take a moment to forward it to your colleagues. They can also subscribe here.
You’ll find teachable moments from our previous issues in the archives. Send your suggestions and success stories to [email protected].
Sign up to receive NLP Connections (news about our work) or switch your subscription to the non-educator version of The Sift called Get Smart About News here.
Check out NLP's Checkology virtual classroom, where students learn how to navigate today’s information landscape by developing news literacy skills.