GSAN: Special issue: Quiz yourself on misinfo

 

Hi friend of news literacy,

Our News Literacy Project colleague Dan Evon is taking over Get Smart About News for this special issue. Dan tracks and writes about misinformation trends and tactics for RumorGuard, NLP’s fact-checking site. You may also be familiar with his work from the RumorGuard Rundown section of the regular newsletter. His journalism background includes nearly a decade as a fact-check reporter at Snopes. We asked Dan to share tips to help you spot falsehoods online.

And now, handing it off to Dan. Enjoy!

— The Get Smart About News team

headshot of Dan Evon
 

Top trending misinformation tactics you should know

The word misinformation is bolded and capitalized under two arrows pointing in opposite directions.
Although misinformation topics and trends may change day by day or even minute by minute, methods of manipulating have mostly stayed the same. Image credit: News Literacy Project.
 
I’ve seen my share of falsehoods during my career as a professional fact-checker and let me tell you something: I. Am. Exhausted. A flood of falsehoods washes over social media every day and there aren’t enough fact-checkers in the world to hold back the waters. Which is why news literacy is so essential! By understanding how misinformation is made and why it spreads, and having a few basic fact-checking skills, more people will be able to critically examine viral claims in their feeds and prevent themselves and people they know from being misled. (On a side note, it also means less work for me. 😉)

Every day new falsehoods are created and spread online. But while the topics change from day to day, the methods of manipulation have mostly stayed the same. Images and media are presented out of context, photos and videos are digitally manipulated (including a growing trend of altering audio tracks) and there are baseless, fabricated claims that gain traction simply because they’re attributed to a credible source.

It is important for us to push back against misinformation because these deceptive practices distort our view of the world. Misinformation influences our politics, our health decisions and even how we view our neighbors. And here’s the kicker: it has this effect even when we don’t fall for it — because it influences others who live, work and vote in our communities.

So what can we do? To start, we can learn how these falsehoods are created and which emotional biases they repeatedly attempt to exploit. Here are three of the most common tactics I’ve observed being used to spread misinformation online these days.

Recognizing genuine imagery presented out of context

Nearly every image and video that we come across on social media is presented to us alongside a piece of text — supposedly describing what it shows or expressing some kind of opinion on the alleged subject. This format — some descriptive text paired with a piece of media — is very easy to manipulate. Bad actors, or people posting with the intention to deceive, can quickly and easily use genuine images out of context to create a convincing piece of misinformation.

This tactic is used by bad actors to spread false rumors about everything from genetically modified mosquitoes to so-called immigrant “invasions” to book bans, but this method of manipulation is especially prevalent during breaking news about mass casualty events. Whether it relates to destruction from a natural disaster or a deadly international conflict, bad actors seek to capitalize on the public’s curiosity about these highly emotional events by sharing out-of-context images that mislead people about current events. This leaves the public confused about what is and what isn’t authentic.

QUESTION 1:
A screenshot of a post from X says, “More than 100 passengers a year fly to Austria when they meant to fly to Australia So Salzburg Airport has a special counter for them” attached to an image of a screen that says “Sorry, this is Austria not Australia! Need help? Please press the button.” The News Literacy Project has added a label that reads “out of context.”
Click the image above to open this image and question online.

This is a genuine photo taken at the Salzburg airport in Austria, but it does not depict a help desk for people who thought they were flying to Australia. Can you guess the original context of this photo, which was changed to spread misinformation?

This is a photo of an advertisement.
This is a photo of a sign created by the AFF (Australian Federation of Fools) as a prank.
This is an old photo of a help desk that was proposed as a concept in 1997 but was rejected.

Don’t be manipulated by manipulated images

While they take a little bit longer to produce and require a little more effort and skill, manipulated media can be just as deceptive as out-of-context media. Altered photos and videos often appear genuine at first glance, especially when the edits are subtle, such as adding a few extra pounds to a political figure or changing the text on a sign.

But altering the visuals tends to leave behind cues that careful observers are likely to catch. Which is likely one reason why altering the audio of videos is becoming a more common tactic used to spread false claims. With generative AI tools that can alter a person’s movements and mimic their voices, bad actors can make it seem as if political figures are making statements that they never did. Adding crowd noise, such as people heckling a political candidate, into a viral video is another popular iteration of this tactic. And since this alteration happens “off-screen,” it is more difficult to detect and requires people to carefully consider the source of the content — and sometimes to track down its original — to make a determination about its authenticity.

QUESTION 2:
A screenshot of a video posted on X says “Dubai put on a skeleton drone show for Halloween” attached to a video of a supposed drone skeleton walking at night. The News Literacy Project has added a play button and a “manipulated content” label over the post.
Click the image above to get a link to the video and question online.

Digital editing tools have made it difficult to distinguish between genuine and doctored content with the naked eye. But looking at the surrounding context of a piece of media can still sometimes reveal clues about authenticity. Which of the following are clues that may indicate that this video of a dancing drone skeleton is a fake?

The crowd seems disinterested (or even unaware) of this drone display.
There are no additional videos of this skeleton drone display taken from other angles.
There are no news reports or press releases about this Halloween festival.
All of the above.

Identifying impostors

Impostor content works by presenting false information in the costume of credibility. The damage this type of misinformation causes is twofold: By presenting a fabricated news report alongside all of the logos and chyrons you’d expect to see from a credible news outlet, bad actors can not only make a fictitious item seem plausible but they can also disparage credible news outlets and exacerbate distrust in credible news sources. Fabricating social media posts is another popular form of impostor content that can fly under our radar when it plays into our pre-existing biases. Both fake news headlines and fabricated posts tend to circulate solely in the form of a screenshot — which is a red flag to watch out for.

Impostor content can also hijack the reputations of well-liked celebrities to launder political opinions that would otherwise be unpalatable. By pretending that a popular person wore a T-shirt expressing a polarizing viewpoint or by presenting a meme containing a fabricated quote, purveyors of disinformation can make it seem as if a particular point of view has more support than it really does, which in turn can influence the opinions of others.

Misinformation is designed to influence our understanding of the world so that it can influence our opinions. When we know the tactics that these propaganda peddlers use, we dramatically increase our ability to spot this content, slow its spread and prevent ourselves from being duped.

QUESTION 3:
A collage of four images of soccer player Lionel Messi shows before and after examples of disinformation through doctored photos. The News Literacy Project has added a red X on two images of Messi — one in which he holds an Israeli flag and another in which he holds a Palestinian flag. The News Literacy Project has also added a green checkmark to two images of Messi where he’s holding a sign that says “icons.com”.
Click the image above to open this image and question online.

What disinformation pattern(s) do these two doctored photos of soccer superstar Lionel Messi exemplify? Select all that apply:

Using a popular celebrity to “endorse” a specific issue or cause.
Attempting to harass a popular athlete using misinformation.
Altering visuals of a sign or placard held up by a celebrity.
Using impostor content for a figure with global appeal.

Want more tips like this? Join the RumorGuard today to get email alerts about how viral falsehoods are created, why they spread and what you can do to stop them.

How do you like this newsletter?
Dislike? Not sure? Like? Click to fill out our feedback survey.
 
Love this newsletter? Please take a moment to forward it to your friends, or they can subscribe here. We also welcome your feedback here.
 

Thanks for reading!

Your weekly issue of Get Smart About News is created by Susan Minichiello (@susanmini), Dan Evon (@danieljevon), Peter Adams (@PeterD_Adams), Hannah Covington (@HannahCov) and Pamela Brunskill (@PamelaBrunskill). It is edited by Mary Kane (@marykkane) and Lourdes Venard (@lourdesvenard).

Sign up to receive NLP Connections (news about our work) or switch your subscription to the educator version of Get Smart About News called The Sift® here.

 

Check out NLP's Checkology virtual classroom, where you can learn to better navigate today’s information landscape by developing news literacy skills.